Pages

Essay Plans: History 2A (Henry II, Richard and John)

Because someone requested my essay plans... here there are!
The essay questions and a bad plan to go with it!!!

NOTE:
I have put these under headings of Henry II, Richard or John and then numbered them with relevant topics. (Yes they're unbalanced having only 1 John question lolz, but I did things last minute so I think I did pretty well :-)!)
For example, the first three questions are on the topic of the Great Rebellion, so you can pretty much include the same things just address the question in the way it is phrased.

DISCLAIMER:
But please do take into consideration that I did these in a rush when I was doing them as revision and they may exclude a few important things so do not solely rely on these dodge-ly done plans. Although I had them checked (I physically wrote the changes and I didn't photocopy it or digitally change the plans), do check with your teachers that these plans are accurate and anything more you could add to it.


Henry II
  1. To what extent was it Henry II’s baronial policy from 1154 that led to the Great Rebellion of 1173 to 1174?
  2. ‘It was Henry II’s treatment of his sons that led to the Great Rebellion of 1173 – 1174.’ Explain why you agree or disagree with this view.
  3. ‘The rebellion of 1173 – 1174 was caused by King Henry II’s treatment of his sons.’ Assess the validity of this view.
  • Baronial Policy
    • Cartae Baronum
    • Inquest of Sheriffs
    • Assizes of Clarendon
  • Henry II’s treatment of his sons
    • Young Henry’s jealousy
      • John was given 3 castles whilst he was given no territory for himself or his wife and wanted power
    • Geoffrey and Richard had land to rule over, former had Brittany, latter had Aquitaine
  • Overall causes of Great Rebellion
    • Eleanor’s jealousy of Rosamund and anger of Gascony
    • Young Henry’s jealousy
    • Richard and Geoffrey persuaded by Eleanor to join
    • Louis VII wanted to diminish Henry’s authority
    • William the Lion of Scotland wanted to regain land from David’s reign
    • Other rebels disliked baronial policy and wished to establish more power
  • Judgement
    • Baronial policy played a great role, it led to long term hatred
    • Taking away their power meant they craved more and saw an opportunity to do so through the Great Rebellion and hence they took part in it
    • Other factors played a part i.e. Eleanor and Young Henry’s jealousy
    • Ultimately, the numbers of barons and their role in the great rebellion was far more significant but it did not lead to the Great Rebellion as it was only an opportunity for them to regain power and to diminish royal authority
    • What led to the Great Rebellion was the jealous of Young Henry and Eleanor in which they sought Louis VII to diminish Henry II’s royal authority and thus other rebellions became involved

  1. ‘Henry II was in a strong position as King of England by the end of 1154.’ Explain why you agree or disagree with this view.
  • Strong Position
    • Duke of Normandy 1150
    • Count of Anjou 1151
    • Married Eleanor of Aquitaine 1152
    • Eustace died 1153, no potential threat to throne
    • Treaty of Wallingford finalised Henry’s ‘jure hereditario’
    • Most of the powerful and independent earls died during Stephen’s reign i.e. Ranulf of Chester and Gilbert de Clare of Pembroke
  • Weak Position
    • Royal authority undermined, £3,000 royal finances alienated
    • 40 Adulterine Castles
    • Barons’ power increasing
    • Geoffrey de Mandeville held sheriffdoms of London-Middlesex and Essex-Hertfordshire in hereditary right
    • No solid coinage system – Stephen, Matilda, Barons

  1. How far had Henry II fulfilled his promise to restore royal authority in England by 1170?
  • Royal Authority in England
    • Barons and Royal Demesne
    • Adulterine castles
    • Regained lands lost in Stephen’s reign
    • Cartae Baronum 1166
    • Inquest of Sheriffs 1170
  • Law and Justice
    • 1166 Assizes of Clarendon
    • Mort D’ancestor and Novel Disseisin
    • Justice-in-eyre reformed
  • Royal Finances
    • Revived Exchequer – worked to full efficiency by 1169
    • Erased baronage coinage and introduced own one
    • Sheriffdoms given to Richard de Lacy and Thomas Becket
  • Church
    • Wanted to reform ecclesiastical courts – undermined authority and justice wasn’t performed as Henry would’ve liked
    • Constitutions of Clarendon – bad, never carried out anyways due to Becket ordeal

  1. ‘Threats to Henry II’s control in Angevin France between 1183 and 1189 were a consequence of his own actions.’ Explain why you agree or disagree with this view.
  • Henry’s treatment of his sons
    • Young Henry’s Rebellion 1183
      • Thirst for more land and power
      • Not having equal distribution of land and power for sons – left long term impact and jealousy for Young Henry
    • By the time Young Henry died in 1183, Henry II refused to recognise Richard as heir
      • Sided with Philip but Philip also manipulated the situation
  • Relationship between Richard and Young Henry was bad
    • Philip II of France
      • Manipulation – played on Richard’s weaknesses
      • Seized Angevin France via treachery and invasions but also claimed areas of France to be his i.e. Brittany when Geoffrey dies and there is no suitable heir
      • Both him and Richard seized lands together

Richard
  1. ‘John was the greatest threat to Richard I’s control of Angevin France.’ Assess the validity of this view with reference to the years 1192 – 1199.
  • In the earlier years, John could be seen as a potential threat to Richard’s control of England, but not so much of a threat to Angevin France as when Richard returned to Normandy for war against Philip in 1194, John begged for Richard’s forgiveness.
  • John as a threat?
    • Yes
      • 1193, Alliances with Philip and began stirring problems in Normandy
      • City of Evreux given to John to hold by Philip
      • 1194, John was willing to surrender all the lands east of Rouen
    • No
      • May 1194, Richard arrives in Normandy and John begs for Richard’s forgiveness
      • Helps Richard, used subterfuge to gain entrance to Evreux
      • Massacred garrison and handed city to Richard
  • Philip as a threat?
    • Yes
      • April 1193, Philip invades Normandy, Gisors, a key castle surrenders to Philip
      • Most of North-Eastern Normandy fell into Philip’s hands
      • July 1193, Forced Richard’s men to agree to peace at Mantes
          • Philip kept all of Richard’s territorial gains and gained major strongholds of Drincourt, Arques, Loches and Chatillon-sur-Indres
      • Could potentially gain more lands in Normandy from John
      • July 1194, Philip reinvaded Normandy and caught John’s forces in Verneuil
      • Controlled most of Vexin until late 1198
    • No
      • Philip attempts to besiege Rouen but unsuccessful
      • Philip couldn’t get the lands which John promised to surrender since Richard returned
      • Philip’s forces were drove out of Normandy
      • Philip attempted to arrange for a truce but it didn’t hold out for long
      • Baldwin IX of Flanders helped to attack Philip in Artois
      • Sept 1198, at Gisors, Richard launched surprise attack on Philip
      • Almost dominant throughout the Vexin
  • Other things as a threat?
    • No
      • June 1194, Richard easily reasserted authority in Greater Anjou
      • Occupied Tours with help of brother-in-law Sancho of Navarre
      • Also recaptured Loches
      • Jan 1196, Richard recaptured Peace of Louviers
  • Conclusion
    • Richard was successful in the war against Philip, regained his lands back from seizing them and also from the truce agreed in Jan-March 1199 which made Philip renounce virtually all of the territorial gains and castles he took from Richard
    • Only allowed for Philip to keep Gisors
    • Little threat to Richard’s control of Angevin France
    • Philip was only temporarily a threat in the earlier years
    • John was far from the ‘greatest threat’

  1. ‘The government of England was never stable during the reign of Richard I.’ Assess the validity of this view.
  2. ‘England’s government remained stable in the years 1189 to 1199 despite the absences of King Richard I.’ Assess the validity of this view.
  • Stable
    • Longchamp
      • Exchequer operated efficiently
      • Justice was done through Judicial Eyre
    • Coutance
      • Financial exactions put in place to fund Richard’s ransom – little resistance
      • Removed Longchamp’s supports from positions of power to ensure government ran effectively
    • Walter
      • Raised necessary funds needed
      • Reformed administration of justice
      • Stimulated Trade
      • ‘Articles of the Eyre’
      • ‘Edictum Regium’ Reform
  • Unstable
    • Longchamp
      • Lacked support from barons and prelates – John, Hugh of Nonant, Gerard de Camville challenged his authority
      • Irrational behaviour, seized Geoffrey Plantagenet, Archbishop of York at Dover 1191
    • John’s ambitions
      • Undermined Longchamp’s authority by seizing Tickhill and Nottingham castles from him whilst Longchamp was busy punishing Roger Mortimer
      • Needed Walter of Coutance’s intervention to resolve it
      • Richard held captive
      • Regency council paralysed by John
      • John and Philip attempted to bribe German Emperor to keep Richard captive
    • Financial Exactions
      • Revolt against financial exactions in London, 1196 led by William FitzOsbert
    • Persecution of Jews
      • Government was powerless to prevent the slaughter, no one was condemned for actions against the Jews

John
  1. ‘A humiliating defeat for royal authority.’ How valid is this view the outcome of John’s dispute with Pope Innocent III?
  • Interdict 1208
    • John refused to recognise Stephen Langton several times – Innocent III placed interdict on England
    • Interdict generated enormous sums of royal finance
    • Through vacant bishoprics and abbeys – he couldn’t be blamed as he couldn’t appoint a bishop due to interdict
  • Summer 1208, John seized property of priests who refused to perform services and other priestly functions in support of the interdict
    • Reasoned that the English Church’s land had ultimately come from the English Crown in return for spiritual support (William the Conqueror)
      • Those who were loyal to him or were favoured were allowed to recover their properties – everyone else had to pay fines
  • John seized mistresses of the clergy and held them for ransom
    • Another means of finance
  • Bishops
    • Many abandoned him, but Peter des Roches and John de Gray remained
  • Outcome
    • After John’s surrender seen as a humiliation
    • Had to pay annual fee of 1,000 marks
    • But was good for England to some degree
    • Under protection of the Church and Pope
    • Those who opposed John were excommunicated by Pope
    • Good relations with the Pope
  • Judgement
    • Gained enormous funds from English Churches due to vacancies
    • Short-term humiliation but the outcome led to strong relations with the Pope and other papal legates

AGAIN, MAKE SURE YOU DOUBLE CHECK THESE ARE RIGHT!!!!!!
GOOD LUCK WITH EXAMSSSS

Laura

No comments:

Post a Comment

Feel free to correct any mistakes, add your opinion, or just a comment in general!